Author
Listed:
- Pedro Lopez-Merino
(GREDEG - Groupe de Recherche en Droit, Economie et Gestion - UNS - Université Nice Sophia Antipolis (1965 - 2019) - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - UniCA - Université Côte d'Azur)
- Valerie J Stull
(University of Wisconsin-Madison)
- Michael Bell
(University of Wisconsin-Madison)
- Kevin Cloninger
(Mizzou - University of Missouri [Columbia] - University of Missouri System)
- C. Robert Cloninger
(Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis - WUSTL - Washington University in Saint Louis)
- Danilo Garcia
(University of Stavanger, GU - Göteborgs Universitet = University of Gothenburg)
- Claudio Gratton
(GREDEG - Groupe de Recherche en Droit, Economie et Gestion - UNS - Université Nice Sophia Antipolis (1965 - 2019) - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - UniCA - Université Côte d'Azur, University of Wisconsin-Madison)
Abstract
This article introduces a flexible, multi-scale framework for assessing sustainability in agroecological food systems that explicitly incorporates indicators of biopsychosocial well-being across the levels of individuals, communities and institutions, and economics and ecologies. We seek to operationalize the interactive relationship between biopsychosocial health and sustainability, and argue that well-being constitutes a critical service that underpins the resilience and long-term viability of food systems. Our proposed framework bridges psychological, social, and ecological sciences, leveraging participatory and transdisciplinary methodologies. It integrates two complementary sets of metrics: a primary series of validated and standardized tools designed to quantify the different levels (from individual to ecological) and a second, participatory, community-defined set of indicators we term "vital signs of place". These context-sensitive indicators, developed through collaborative and participatory processes, seek to support epistemic justice by centering diverse ways of knowing and living. To ensure the framework remains actionable and avoids becoming a black box, we emphasize parsimony and practical feasibility in the selection of indicators. A deliberately limited and well-prioritized set of metrics enables meaningful implementation, supports stakeholder engagement, and facilitates interpretation across contexts. The resulting framework balances comparability across regions with adaptability to local priorities and is applicable at multiple scales—from watersheds to regional levels. Central to our approach is the conceptualization of well-being as the dynamic expression of self-directedness, cooperativeness, and self-transcendence both in individuals and communities, following C. Robert Cloninger's biopsychosocial model of personality. This view highlights well-being not merely as a state, but as a developmental process emerging from purposeful agency, social connectedness, and a sense of meaning beyond the self—across individuals, communities, and institutions. We emphasize as well the interactive role of socio-ecological organization in encouraging, or discouraging, these dimensions of well-being. The different standardized metrics and participatory indicators are looked at from this perspective. By focusing on the lived experiences and biopsychosocial health of rural communities, our approach aims to contribute to long-term sustainability efforts and addresses key challenges related to the Sustainable Developmental Goals. This framework offers tools and actionable guidance for researchers, policymakers, and practitioners seeking to center well-being in the transformation of the socio-ecological organization of food systems.
Suggested Citation
Pedro Lopez-Merino & Valerie J Stull & Michael Bell & Kevin Cloninger & C. Robert Cloninger & Danilo Garcia & Claudio Gratton, 2026.
"Measuring well-being in agroecological food systems: a multi-scale framework for sustainability indicators,"
Post-Print
halshs-05606951, HAL.
Handle:
RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-05606951
DOI: 10.3389/fsufs.2026.1757486
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-05606951v1
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-05606951. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.