IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-04771350.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Les Défauts Récurrents Des Productions Des Doctorants Durant Leur Processus De Thèse

Author

Listed:
  • Alexis Roche

    (Laboratoire de Recherche Magellan - UJML - Université Jean Moulin - Lyon 3 - Université de Lyon - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises (IAE) - Lyon, UJML - Université Jean Moulin - Lyon 3 - Université de Lyon, ISEOR - Institut de Socio-économie des Entreprises et des ORganisations - Institut de socio-économie des entreprises et des organisations)

Abstract

This paper focuses on the recurring defects in doctoral students' productions during their thesis process. While the literature, particularly through books, regularly discusses thesis development guides and methodology, it is rare that scientific articles analyze concrete feedback concerning the production defects of PhD students during the thesis or DBA (Doctorate Business in Administration) process. Our analysis is based on feedback from 14 years' experience, including 10 years as moderator, of a monthly doctoral seminar. The written capitalization of comments from the researcher, other doctoral students and other teacher-researchers, cross-referenced with other experiences during tutorials and colloquia, reveals more or less recurrent shortcomings during the thesis process. In view of the stakes involved in completing a thesis in 3 years, and the dysfunctional elements that can follow the doctor throughout his or her career, we thought it would be interesting to analyze these defects. This analysis can help doctoral students and those who supervise them to better prevent these various defects and facilitate understanding of the expectations of theses.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexis Roche, 2024. "Les Défauts Récurrents Des Productions Des Doctorants Durant Leur Processus De Thèse," Post-Print halshs-04771350, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-04771350
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-04771350. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.