IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-03665629.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Finalization and Validation of Questionnaire and Algorithm of SPUR, a New Adherence Profiling Tool

Author

Listed:
  • Elodie de Bock

    (ICON plc [Lyon])

  • Kevin Dolgin

    (Observia)

  • Léa Kombargi

    (Observia)

  • Benoit Arnould

    (ICON plc [Lyon])

  • Tanguy Vilcot

    (ICON plc [Lyon])

  • Guillaume Hubert

    (Observia)

  • Marie-Eve Laporte

    (IAE Paris - Sorbonne Business School)

  • Lydiane Nabec

    (Université Paris-Saclay)

  • Gérard Reach

    (Université Sorbonne Paris Nord)

Abstract

Purpose: The SPUR (Social, Psychological, Usage and Rational) Adherence Profiling Tool is a recently developed adaptive instrument for assessing key patient-level drivers for non-adherence. This study describes the SPUR questionnaire's finalization and psychometric evaluation. Patients and methods: Data were collected through an online survey among patients with type 2 diabetes included by general practitioners and diabetologists in France. The survey included four questionnaires, SPUR and three validated adherence measures: BMQ, MARS and ACCEPT. Item-level analysis and a Partial Credit Model (PCM) were performed to refine the response option coding of SPUR items. The final item selection of SPUR was defined using a PCM and a Principal Component Analysis (PCA). Construct validity, concurrent validity and known-groups validity were assessed on the final SPUR questionnaire.Results: 245 patients (55% men, mean age of 63 years) completed the survey remotely, and were included in this analysis. Refining response option coding allowed a better discrimination of patients on the latent trait. After item selection, a short, an intermediate, and a long form composed the final SPUR questionnaire. The short form will be used to screen patients for risk and then the other forms will allow the collection of further information to refine the risk assessment and decide the best levers for action. Results obtained were supportive of the construct validity of the forms. Their concurrent validity was demonstrated: moderate to high significant correlations were obtained with BMQ, MARS and ACCEPT scores. Their known-groups validity were shown with a logical pattern of higher scores obtained for patients considered non-adherent and significant differences between the scores obtained for patients considered adherent versus non-adherent.Conclusion: SPUR is a valid tool to evaluate the risk of non-adherence of patients, allowing effective intervention by providing insights into the respective individual reasons for lack of adherence.

Suggested Citation

  • Elodie de Bock & Kevin Dolgin & Léa Kombargi & Benoit Arnould & Tanguy Vilcot & Guillaume Hubert & Marie-Eve Laporte & Lydiane Nabec & Gérard Reach, 2022. "Finalization and Validation of Questionnaire and Algorithm of SPUR, a New Adherence Profiling Tool," Post-Print halshs-03665629, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-03665629
    DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S354705
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-03665629
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-03665629/document
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2147/PPA.S354705?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-03665629. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.