IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-02934184.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The progressive view of Old Institutionalism: business ethics, industrial democracy and reasonable capitalism

Author

Listed:
  • Virgile Chassagnon

    (CREG - Centre de recherche en économie de Grenoble - UGA - Université Grenoble Alpes)

  • Benjamin Dubrion

    (TRIANGLE - Triangle : action, discours, pensée politique et économique - ENS de Lyon - École normale supérieure de Lyon - UL2 - Université Lumière - Lyon 2 - IEP Lyon - Sciences Po Lyon - Institut d'études politiques de Lyon - Université de Lyon - UJM - Université Jean Monnet - Saint-Étienne - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

The question of inequality has been gaining importance in economics since the publication of Piketty’s (2014) book, Capital in the Twenty-First Century. However, few studies have focused on the historical analysis of inequality from the point of view of an unorthodox history of economic thought. This is particularly the case in view of the major developments that American authors such as Ely, Veblen, Commons and Dewey had been able to propose during the Progressive Era. When one looks at the work of Old Institutionalism, one realizes that it contains many theoretical intuitions, concepts and heuristics allowing better treatment of the crucial question of social and economic inequalities in modern capitalism and firms. This chapter shows how the principal authors of Old Institutionalism proposed a vision of the firm and industrial democracy allowing one to think of inequality and the conditions of human development in a more just capitalism.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Virgile Chassagnon & Benjamin Dubrion, 2020. "The progressive view of Old Institutionalism: business ethics, industrial democracy and reasonable capitalism," Post-Print halshs-02934184, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-02934184
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-02934184. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.