IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-01854649.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Which collective emotional regulations to act for resilience as high reliability organizations?

Author

Listed:
  • Monier Hélène

    (Laboratoire de Recherche Magellan - UJML - Université Jean Moulin - Lyon 3 - Université de Lyon - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises (IAE) - Lyon, Centre de Recherche ENSP)

  • Camille M. de Bovis

    (Laboratoire de Recherche Magellan - UJML - Université Jean Moulin - Lyon 3 - Université de Lyon - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises (IAE) - Lyon)

Abstract

During professional situations, to cope with extreme environment, humans choose to involve collectively in action. Characteristics of these environments, with overturn time perception, high expectation demand, and concerns about uncertainty, are really difficult to take on by isolated people. In these extreme environments, High Reliability Organizations are able to bring under control and to lead action to mitigate risk and catastrophes. The organization must be resilient. In HRO, heedful interactions - contributing, representing and subordinating to action - are the core of successful actions. However, if collective and managerial processes are usually observed in research on the topic, very few enquiries focus on emotions, emotional labor and their impact on collective mind. We argue emotions are a part of communication. They give information about how people understand and feel environment and situation, that why they could be very useful to design collective actions. The management of the emotions is a part of the organizational resilience. Thanks to two case studies in different sectors (Intervention Police department, and Emergency Pediatrics Care units), this paper aims to explore/investigate the part of emotions and their effect on reliability of work.

Suggested Citation

  • Monier Hélène & Camille M. de Bovis, 2018. "Which collective emotional regulations to act for resilience as high reliability organizations?," Post-Print halshs-01854649, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01854649
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01854649. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.