IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-01517710.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Are cetacean bycatches lost in translation?

Author

Listed:
  • Alice Lapijover

    (LIENSs - LIttoral ENvironnement et Sociétés - ULR - La Rochelle Université - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Nicolas Becu

    (LIENSs - LIttoral ENvironnement et Sociétés - ULR - La Rochelle Université - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Matthieu Authier

    (PELAGIS - Observatoire pour la Conservation de la Mégafaune Marine - LIENSs - LIttoral ENvironnement et Sociétés - ULR - La Rochelle Université - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Vincent Ridoux

    (PELAGIS - Observatoire pour la Conservation de la Mégafaune Marine - LIENSs - LIttoral ENvironnement et Sociétés - ULR - La Rochelle Université - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, CEBC - Centre d'Études Biologiques de Chizé - UMR 7372 - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique - ULR - La Rochelle Université - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

Bycatches appear to be one of the main causes of man-induced mortality of dolphins and porpoises in the Bay of Biscay. However bycatch estimations for common dolphins vary between 550 (observer-based estimate) and 4700 (stranding-based estimate) per year in the area depending on the methodological choice. In addition to problematic monitoring, mitigation measures as the use of pingers have been inefficient in French waters. Consequently, improving the understanding of interactions between small cetaceans and fisheries remains a challenge. This paper describes how divergent scientific estimations of cetacean bycatches can affect interactions between stakeholders. By using the Actor-Network Theory, we focused on scientific and managerial instruments translating small cetacean bycatches in the Bay of Biscay. According to this social science perspective, instruments are not neutral and play a central role in defining how stakeholders look at an issue. Translating observations into an aggregated number of bycatches is an expression of power relationships and is closely linked to stakeholders' legitimacy. Similarly, voting a directive on the use of pingers conveys some parties' perspective on the issue. Stakeholders strategies were shown to be influenced by divergent scientific estimations especially if some stakeholders i.e. fishermen or NGOs are not sufficiently involved in the process. Indeed, two different perspectives of the same phenomenon facilitate the controversy and thus reveal the variety of actors' perspectives. Integrating the various stakeholders' viewpoints on small cetacean bycatches is therefore necessary to improve stakeholders' mobilization and so move towards a shared definition of the issue. To conclude, getting a sharper picture of small cetacean bycatches implies being able to include stakeholders' strategies and representations of the system. Integrating the various ways to look at small cetacean bycatches could be done through experimentation workshops focusing on instruments.

Suggested Citation

  • Alice Lapijover & Nicolas Becu & Matthieu Authier & Vincent Ridoux, 2017. "Are cetacean bycatches lost in translation?," Post-Print halshs-01517710, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01517710
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01517710. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.