IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-01343566.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

L’évaluation de la communication publique, entre norme gestionnaire et légitimités, des enjeux difficilement conciliables ?

Author

Listed:
  • Dominique Bessières

    (LGE - Laboratoire de Génie Electrique - UPPA - Université de Pau et des Pays de l'Adour)

Abstract

The evaluation of public communication is interesting insofar as it articulates several scales, macro and micro, global and organizational, managerial and Professional. To what extent this new injunction in the evaluation correspond to a set and normalizing, what sense can we give ? This is a sign of modernization of public action which offends the public culture in some extent. His place is a continuum ranging from a near absence to examples of a strong hold.

Suggested Citation

  • Dominique Bessières, 2010. "L’évaluation de la communication publique, entre norme gestionnaire et légitimités, des enjeux difficilement conciliables ?," Post-Print halshs-01343566, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01343566
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01343566
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01343566/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:dau:papers:123456789/738 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01343566. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.