IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-01337249.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Do Performance Metrics Erode Collegiality? Empirical Evidence from French Universities

Author

Listed:
  • Stéphanie Chatelain-Ponroy

    (LIRSA - Laboratoire interdisciplinaire de recherche en sciences de l'action - CNAM - Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers [CNAM] - HESAM - HESAM Université - Communauté d'universités et d'établissements Hautes écoles Sorbonne Arts et métiers université)

  • Stéphanie Mignot-Gerard

    (IRG - Institut de Recherche en Gestion - UPEM - Université Paris-Est Marne-la-Vallée - UPEC UP12 - Université Paris-Est Créteil Val-de-Marne - Paris 12)

  • Christine Musselin

    (CSO - Centre de sociologie des organisations (Sciences Po, CNRS) - Sciences Po - Sciences Po - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Samuel Sponem

    (HEC Montréal - HEC Montréal)

Abstract

This paper, based on a quantitative study of the governance of universities in France, analyses the extent to which the use of performance metrics within our contemporary universities are transforming the collegial nature of the latter.

Suggested Citation

  • Stéphanie Chatelain-Ponroy & Stéphanie Mignot-Gerard & Christine Musselin & Samuel Sponem, 2016. "Do Performance Metrics Erode Collegiality? Empirical Evidence from French Universities," Post-Print halshs-01337249, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01337249
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01337249. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.