IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-01313709.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Bohr complementarity in memory retrieval

Author

Listed:
  • Jacob Denolf

    (UGENT - Universiteit Gent = Ghent University)

  • Ariane Lambert-Mogiliansky

    (PSE - Paris School of Economics - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - ENS-PSL - École normale supérieure - Paris - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - ENPC - École des Ponts ParisTech - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement, PSE - Paris-Jourdan Sciences Economiques - ENS-PSL - École normale supérieure - Paris - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - ENPC - École des Ponts ParisTech - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

We comment on the use of the mathematical formalism of Quantum Mechanics in the analysis of the documented subadditivity phenomenon in human episodic memory. This approach was first proposed by Brainerd et al. in Brainerd et al. (2013). The subadditivity of probability in focus arises as a violation of the disjunction rule of Boolean algebra. This phenomenon is viewed as a consequence of the co-existence of two types of memory traces: verbatim and gist. Instead of assuming that verbatim and gist trace can combine into a coherent memory state of superposition as is done in the QEM model, we propose to model gist and verbatim traces as Bohr complementary properties of memory. In mathematical terms, we represent the two types of memory as alternative bases of one and the same Hilbert Space. We argue that, in contrast with the QEM model, our model appeals to the one essential distinction between classical and quantum models of reality namely the existence of incompatible but complementary properties of a system. This feature is also at the heart of the quantum cognition approach to mental phenomena. We sketch an experiment that could separate the two models. We next test our model with data from the same word list experiment as the one used by Brainerd et al. While our model entails significantly less degrees of freedom it yields a good fit to the experimental data.

Suggested Citation

  • Jacob Denolf & Ariane Lambert-Mogiliansky, 2016. "Bohr complementarity in memory retrieval," Post-Print halshs-01313709, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01313709
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jmp.2016.03.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01313709. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.