IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Le critère du bien-être du consommateur comme objectif exclusif de la politique de concurrence: une mise en perspective sur la base de l’histoire de l’Antitrust américain

Listed author(s):
  • Frédéric Marty


    (GREDEG - Groupe de Recherche en Droit, Economie et Gestion - CNRS - UNS - Université Nice Sophia Antipolis)

According to the European Commission competition law enforcement has to be based on an effects-based approach. This one, already implemented by U.S. Antitrust enforcers, is inspired by the Chicago School. In accordance with this approach consumer welfare must be the exclusive criterion to take into account to assess the lawfulness of a given market practice. We consider the history of the U.S. Antitrust in order to analyse the processes by which this view has become predominant and to put into evidence that alternative criteria, as distributive justice or the control of private economic power, have been or may be selected in competition with the consumer welfare one

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Paper provided by HAL in its series Post-Print with number halshs-01147877.

in new window

Date of creation: 02 May 2015
Publication status: Published in Revue Internationale de Droit Economique, Association internationale de droit économique, 2015, 2014 (4), pp.271-297.
Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01147877
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server:
Contact details of provider: Web page:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01147877. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (CCSD)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.