IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-00845001.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The search for unity in the French accountancy profession, 1969-1996

Author

Listed:
  • S. El Omari,
  • J.L Rossignol,
  • Michèle Saboly

    (CRM - Centre de Recherche en Management - UT Capitole - Université Toulouse Capitole - UT - Université de Toulouse - IAE - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises - Toulouse - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

The French accountancy profession is represented by two principal professional organisations, one comprising experts-comptables, or chartered accountants, and the other commissaires aux comptes, or auditors. Following the organisation of the audit profession in 1969, attempts have been made to form a single accountancy profession. The paper analyses the unsuccessful attempts to achieve unification from the 1970s to the 1990s. It is shown that the motivation for unification mutated over the focal period. Changing organisational elites played significant roles in furthering and hindering attempts at merger. The intervention of the state was a source of confusion and added complexity to professional discourses. The existence of unions (syndicats) and associations within the professional organisations is revealed as a peculiar and significant feature of professional configurations in France. The increasing presence of large international firms in France also impacted on the debate. Despite increased cooperation between the two professional groups, unification was not achieved. Divergent visions of the professional model, personal differences between organisational actors and the fragmentation of interests within the two professions ensured the preservation of organisational separatism

Suggested Citation

  • S. El Omari, & J.L Rossignol, & Michèle Saboly, 2013. "The search for unity in the French accountancy profession, 1969-1996," Post-Print halshs-00845001, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00845001
    DOI: 10.1080/21552851.2013.773637
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00845001. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.