IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

L'expert ou le peuple ? Deux attitudes polaires face à la politique de concurrence

Listed author(s):
  • Marc Deschamps

    ()

    (GREDEG - Groupe de Recherche en Droit, Economie et Gestion - UNS - Université Nice Sophia Antipolis - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, BETA - Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - UL - Université de Lorraine - Université de Strasbourg)

The aim of this article is to demonstrate that beyond the various conceptions of competition policy, there are two opposing positions. The first claims that competition policy must be independent of all political considerations. It should therefore be entrusted to an independent authority, whose legitimacy is founded on expertise. The second position claims that competition policy, as any other economic policy, is necessarily of a political nature in a democracy. It must result from the will of the people, and not be grounded on pure expertise. These two positions are founded on opposite conceptions of economic analysis.

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Paper provided by HAL in its series Post-Print with number halshs-00766846.

as
in new window

Length:
Date of creation: 2012
Publication status: Published in Revue Internationale de Droit Economique, Association internationale de droit économique, 2012, t. XXVI (1), pp.57-94
Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00766846
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00766846
Contact details of provider: Web page: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00766846. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (CCSD)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.