IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-00732918.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The enigmatic Mr Graslin. A Rousseauist bedrock for Classical economics?

Author

Listed:
  • Gilbert Faccarello

    (ERMES - Equipe de recherche sur les marches, l'emploi et la simulation - UP2 - Université Panthéon-Assas - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

Drawing inspiration from aspects of the sensationist philosophy of the time and also the political philosophy of Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Jean-Joseph-Louis Graslin (1727-1790) -- a fierce critic of Physiocracy -- developed a remarkably coherent political economy based on a "three stages" theory of society, a labour theory of normal prices and distribution, and a concept of vertically-integrated sectors. He also put forward some ideas -- the role of needs in the determination of market prices, a process of gravitation towards equilibrium, a quid pro quo theory of taxation -- which attracted Turgot's attention. Had it not been neglected, Graslin's approach could well have formed a possible foundation for Classical economics -- broadly defined as proposing a system of equilibrium "natural" prices based on the conditions of production, with market prices oscillating around them. In the present article I first explore Graslin's basic motivation (section 2). I then deal with his "three stages" theory of society, which lies at the core of his analytical argument (section 3). Then follows an analysis of his principle ideas in respect of needs, wealth and value (sections 4), production equilibrium and prices (section 5), and finally public economics (section 6).

Suggested Citation

  • Gilbert Faccarello, 2009. "The enigmatic Mr Graslin. A Rousseauist bedrock for Classical economics?," Post-Print halshs-00732918, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00732918
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00732918. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.