IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-00723656.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Proprietary or Open Source Software? Winner-Takes-All Competition, Partial Adoption and Efficiency

Author

Listed:
  • Eric Darmon

    (CREM - Centre de recherche en économie et management - UNICAEN - Université de Caen Normandie - NU - Normandie Université - UR - Université de Rennes - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Thomas Le Texier

    (CREM - Centre de recherche en économie et management - UNICAEN - Université de Caen Normandie - NU - Normandie Université - UR - Université de Rennes - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Dominique Torre

    (GREDEG - Groupe de Recherche en Droit, Economie et Gestion - UNS - Université Nice Sophia Antipolis (1965 - 2019) - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - UniCA - Université Côte d'Azur)

Abstract

We study the conditions ruling the diffusion of open source as opposed to proprietary software distributed by a commercial editor. The two types of software differ in relation to their adoption costs and to the range of functionalities they offer. By distinguishing software users according to their ability to contribute to the production of open source solutions, we characterize the Nash equilibrium in a sequential game in which users choose to adopt open source software or proprietary software or not to adopt. We find that adoption patterns depend on the conditions related to the users' expectations and we highlight potential cases of both winner-takes-all and shared-market outcomes. Since multiple equilibria are only imperfectly controlled by the commercial editor, we show that the latter's strategy can be understood as a balance between a low price high quality strategy and a high price low quality strategy. Welfare analysis provides mixed results. The existence of a credible open source threat improves the utility of end-users even if the proprietary solution is eventually adopted. The diffusion of open source software can generate conflicts of interest. In some cases, these conflicts oppose the interests of users to those of the commercial firm. Yet, in other cases, the interests of some users can be aligned to those of the commercial editor.

Suggested Citation

  • Eric Darmon & Thomas Le Texier & Dominique Torre, 2011. "Proprietary or Open Source Software? Winner-Takes-All Competition, Partial Adoption and Efficiency," Post-Print halshs-00723656, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00723656
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Eric Darmon & Dominique Torre, 2010. "Open source, dual licensing and software compétition," Post-Print halshs-00497623, HAL.
    2. Gauguier, Jean-Jacques, 2009. "L’industrialisation de l’Open Source," Economics Thesis from University Paris Dauphine, Paris Dauphine University, number 123456789/4388 edited by Toledano, Joëlle.
    3. Alexia Gaudeul, 2008. "Consumer Welfare and Market Structure in a Model of Competition between Open Source and Proprietary Software," Working Paper series, University of East Anglia, Centre for Competition Policy (CCP) 2008-31, Centre for Competition Policy, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK..

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00723656. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.