IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-00640549.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Work organization and intent to leave : a relationship-dependent on work status?

Author

Listed:
  • Gregor Bouville

    (Management & Organisation - DRM - Dauphine Recherches en Management - Université Paris Dauphine-PSL - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

This study investigates the work status-specific relationship between a large set of organizational factors and intent to leave. Organizational factors includes monotonous work, time pressure, skill variety, job autonomy, working hours, flexible schedule, shift work, post rotations, painful postures, thermal and noise pollutions, tensions with the public, aggressions from the public, bullying, supervisor support, colleagues support, and hierarchical control. Three types of work status were represented in the research: fixed-term workers (n = 752), temporary workers (n = 512) and permanent workers (n = 798). Compared to permanent workers, temporary workers have higher probability to report "intent to leave quickly" but fixed-term workers are less likely to report "intent to leave later". Differences between given reasons for intent to leave were also observed. Compared to permanent workers, fixed-term workers are more likely to report intent to leave for job content reason and temporary workers are more likely to report intent to leave for wage reason. The research also demonstrates that work organization, working conditions and social relations at work have work status-specific links with intent to leave. Our results highlight the importance of work-status-differentiated organizational practices to keep permanent and fixed-term workers.

Suggested Citation

  • Gregor Bouville, 2011. "Work organization and intent to leave : a relationship-dependent on work status?," Post-Print halshs-00640549, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00640549
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00640549. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.