IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-00536895.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Perspectives nouvelles en Théorie des organisations : Jacques Rojot vs. Hayek ?

Author

Listed:
  • Hubert de La Bruslerie

    (DRM - Dauphine Recherches en Management - Université Paris Dauphine-PSL - PSL - Université Paris sciences et lettres - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

Dans son ouvrage magistral Théorie des Organisations, J. Rojot avance deux noms d'auteurs qui ouvrent chacun une piste d'avancée vers ce qu'il appelle « l'individualisme méthodologique complexe » : J.P. Dupuy et I. Giddens . Est-ce à dire que l'individualisme méthodologique complexe est la voie privilégié d'interrogation pour le chercheur en organisations et au-delà en Sciences de Gestion ? Il ne s'agit pas ici de vouloir analyser les écrits ou les apports de Dupuy et de Giddens, ni de critiquer l'ouverture importante que constitue la voie de l'individualisme méthodologique complexe, mais plutôt de la poursuivre en la complétant par les apports d'un troisième auteur bien connu en économie et moins en sciences de gestion : Friedrich Von Hayek.

Suggested Citation

  • Hubert de La Bruslerie, 2010. "Perspectives nouvelles en Théorie des organisations : Jacques Rojot vs. Hayek ?," Post-Print halshs-00536895, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00536895
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00536895
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00536895/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    rationalité; information;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00536895. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.