IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-00359099.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Reciprocity and Reputation on Credit Market: Experimental Evidence

Author

Listed:
  • Simon Cornée

    (CREM - Centre de recherche en économie et management - UNICAEN - Université de Caen Normandie - NU - Normandie Université - UR1 - Université de Rennes 1 - UNIV-RENNES - Université de Rennes - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • David Masclet

    (CREM - Centre de recherche en économie et management - UNICAEN - Université de Caen Normandie - NU - Normandie Université - UR1 - Université de Rennes 1 - UNIV-RENNES - Université de Rennes - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Gervais Thenet

    (CREM - Centre de recherche en économie et management - UNICAEN - Université de Caen Normandie - NU - Normandie Université - UR1 - Université de Rennes 1 - UNIV-RENNES - Université de Rennes - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

This paper reports the results of an experiment that investigates the effects of reciprocity and reputation on credit market performance. To do so, we replicate the three treatments carried out by Fehr and Zehnder (2005) in their experiment and introduce some alterations. More precisely, in our experiment, participants are matched by pairs exogenously so they have the opportunity of reputation building. Furthermore, our experiment allows us to investigate the effect of information on reputation building. In the first treatment called partner no information a lender and a borrower are matched for the all duration of the experiment. The second treatment (stranger no information) is identical to the previous one except that it is played under a stranger matching protocol. The third treatment (partner information) solely differs from the first one by the fact that the lenders have access to the project selected by the borrowers and the project outcome. The last treatment (Third party no information) allows for the introduction of a third party in charge of enforcing the contracts whereas in the three conditions aforementioned the contracts are not enforceable by an exogenous force. Our results show that an honour-based market – wherein participants cannot build up long term relationship – is not viable on the long run because borrowers have no repayment incentives, though a significant fraction of borrowers reciprocate fair offers. The opportunity to engage bilateral long term relationships strongly improves the market performance by partially mitigating the repayment problem and thus enhancing cooperation between borrowers and lenders. The latter succeed in applying a conditional contract renewal strategy. As a consequence selfish borrowers have an incentive to behave reciprocally. Surprisingly, rendering the information symmetric and transparent between the two parties involved does not improve market performance. This fact seems to highlight the prominence of reputation as a disciplining devise. The presence of an exogenous force in charge of enforcing contract undeniably improves the credit market functioning by solving the repayment problem and thus giving more confidence to the investors but also exacerbates moral hazard associated with project selection. Interestingly, the fact that lenders offer fair financing conditions significantly lowers moral hazard

Suggested Citation

  • Simon Cornée & David Masclet & Gervais Thenet, 2008. "Reciprocity and Reputation on Credit Market: Experimental Evidence," Post-Print halshs-00359099, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00359099
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00359099
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00359099. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (CCSD). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.