IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-00324417.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Diffusion du Coton Génétiquement Modifié en Afrique du Sud : des leçons pour l'Afrique Zone Franc

Author

Listed:
  • Jean-Luc Hofs

    (Cirad-CA-UPR 10 Systèmes cotonniers - Systèmes cotonniers en petit paysannat - CA - Département Cultures annuelles - Cirad - Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement)

  • Michel Fok

    (Cirad-CA-UPR 10 Systèmes cotonniers - Systèmes cotonniers en petit paysannat - CA - Département Cultures annuelles - Cirad - Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement)

  • Marnus Gouse

    (Department of Agricultural Economics, Extension and Rural Development - University of Pretoria [South Africa])

  • Johann Kirsten

    (Department of Agricultural Economics, Extension and Rural Development - University of Pretoria [South Africa])

Abstract

Cotton production in South Africa derives mainly from commercial farming, it is not so much correct to present the so-called success of its adoption of Genetically Modified Cotton (GMC) as an example of successful GMC use by smallholding farmers. With reference to a fluctuating if not declining cotton production, the so-called success is debatable as it is clear that a mere technology introduction cannot ensure production increase. Other factors matter, in particular the institutional ones. Focusing exclusively the debate on the GMC issue has diverted the public attention from dealing with these factors.Cotton sector has suffered from severe instability whose negative effects impacted mainly smallholders. The last stage of the institutional evolution within this sector, oriented towards further intensification secured by irrigation, encompasses a risk of debarring most smallholders from producing cotton if the new approach cannot further scale up. It seems that this questionable evolution of the agriculture in the Makhatini Flats has been concealed by the exclusive debate about GMC.The results of our research complement the existing ones by pointing out bad profitability in an unfavorable climatic and institutional context. This reminds us that rain-fed agriculture remains sensitive to climatic hazards and that adoption of new technology might increase its financial risk. Wholly speaking, the outcomes of the GMC use in South Africa are unstable at a very low yield level. Change in the production cost structure should be emphasized since expenses on seeds becomes the main cash production cost. Today, only a few countries in Francophone African countries benefit from institutional stability which is favorable to GMC introduction. Such an introduction calls for preparation notably to negotiate favorable economic conditions of biotechnology transfer and to reorganize seed distribution in compliance with farmers' interests. This preparation would not be easy and adoption of GMC should not be precipitated..

Suggested Citation

  • Jean-Luc Hofs & Michel Fok & Marnus Gouse & Johann Kirsten, 2006. "Diffusion du Coton Génétiquement Modifié en Afrique du Sud : des leçons pour l'Afrique Zone Franc," Post-Print halshs-00324417, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00324417
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00324417
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00324417/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00324417. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.