IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-00289041.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Institution et justification. De la nécessité de distinguer deux conceptions de la justice

Author

Listed:
  • Bernard Billaudot

    (LEPII - Laboratoire d'Economie de la Production et de l'Intégration Internationale - UPMF - Université Pierre Mendès France - Grenoble 2 - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

Institution and justification, about the need to distinguish two conceptions of justice This paper deals with the place of the concept of justification in the processes of institutions in modern societies. A synthesis is proposed between Commons' transaction theory and Boltanski and Thevenot justification theory. This synthesis involves tearing down and re-building both of these theories with the help of the American philosopher MacIntyre, who distinguishes two general conceptions of justice: the first in terms of excellence, and the second in terms of efficient coordination.

Suggested Citation

  • Bernard Billaudot, 2008. "Institution et justification. De la nécessité de distinguer deux conceptions de la justice," Post-Print halshs-00289041, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00289041
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00289041. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.