IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05846164.html

Just Culture versus Technological Monitoring: Outcome-Based Comparison of Safety Management Models

Author

Listed:
  • Emmanuel Bazzucchi

    (LGTO - Laboratoire de Gestion et des Transitions Organisationnelles - UT3 - Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier - Comue de Toulouse - Communauté d'universités et établissements de Toulouse)

Abstract

This paper investigates whether technological monitoring systems in high -risk work environments can replace managerial practices grounded in just culture principles. A vignette -based experiment with 206 industrial workers compared two approaches to safety: a neurotechnological monitoring device and a managerial system emphasizing fairness, accountability, and organizational learning. Findings indicate that the managerial approach is perceived as more reliable, effective, and supportive of professional commitment, while the technological system is associated with higher privacy concerns and stress. Behavioral intentions also differ, wit h stronger compliance and voluntary participation reported under the managerial condition. This study shows that technological safety devices, when implemented in isolation, incur psychosocial costs that limit their effectiveness. It is therefore recommended that hybrid approaches combining technological precision and managerial practices be emp loyed. Overall, the effectiveness of workplace safety systems depends less on their technical performance than on their integration into organizational practices that promote trust and intrinsic motivation

Suggested Citation

  • Emmanuel Bazzucchi, 2025. "Just Culture versus Technological Monitoring: Outcome-Based Comparison of Safety Management Models," Post-Print hal-05846164, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05846164
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05846164. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.