Author
Listed:
- Maïva Faye-Ropaul
(EGEI - Éthique et Gouvernance de l’Entreprise et des Institutions - UCO - Université Catholique de l'Ouest, LIRAES (URP_ 4470) - Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire de Recherche Appliquée en Economie de la Santé - UPCité - Université Paris Cité, LIEPP - Laboratoire interdisciplinaire d'évaluation des politiques publiques (Sciences Po) - Sciences Po - Sciences Po)
Abstract
Background. When elderly patients lose decision-making capacity at the end of life, physicians rely on relatives to convey their wishes. French law allows patients to appoint a "trusted person" in writing, whose testimony prevails over that of other relatives and who also accompanies and advises the patient. Informal caregivers often perform these tasks without formal designation. Objective. To assess informal caregivers' knowledge of the trusted person scheme, how often they act as trusted persons without designation, and the determinants of formal designation. Methods. An online survey was conducted in May 2022 among 137 informal caregivers of patients aged over 65 in metropolitan France. We built a knowledge scale and classified caregivers into four categories: legally valid trusted persons, de facto trusted persons, withdrawn trusted persons, and simple caregivers. Multinomial probit and probit models were estimated. Results. Caregivers knew the main missions but confused the scheme with legal protection measures and misunderstood the written requirement. Formally designated trusted persons were not more knowledgeable, whereas hospital-informed caregivers were. Most caregivers performed trusted person duties, mostly without formal designation. Legal knowledge did not predict formalization, whereas help with daily activities, de facto performance of duties and nursing home placement did. Chronic conditions and intensive informal care increased the likelihood of assuming trusted person duties. Conclusion. Official designation rates underestimate the number of people acting as trusted persons, questioning the relevance of the current legal framework. Keywords: informal care; trusted person; elderly patients; end of life; France
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05843462. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.