IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05802254.html

Do sovereign ratings capture public pension liabilities in the assessment of public debt? A France–UK comparison

Author

Listed:
  • Eric Paget-Blanc

    (LITEM - Laboratoire en Innovation, Technologies, Economie et Management (EA 7363) - UEVE - Université d'Évry-Val-d'Essonne - Université Paris-Saclay - IMT-BS - Institut Mines-Télécom Business School - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris], UEVE - Université d'Évry-Val-d'Essonne)

  • Faouzi Souissi

    (UPVD - Université de Perpignan Via Domitia)

Abstract

Government financial debt is the main indicator used to assess sovereign solvency, including by credit rating agencies (CRAs), but it does not capture all long-term public commitments. This article uses France and the UK to examine whether state employees' pension commitments are included in public debt analysis by rating agencies. CRAs' debt analyses rely on national accounts, which provide a comparable measure of financial debt across countries. These differ from accrual-based public financial reports, which disclose states' broader liabilities but are more difficult to compare. The difference concerns state employees' pension commitments, which France reports off balance sheet, whereas the UK recognizes them as liabilities. The article argues that pension commitments should not be added to financial liabilities, because they can be renegotiated without implying a default on debt; the article contributes to the literature by proposing their annual cost relative to government revenues as a key indicator of state solvency, which can be compared across countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Eric Paget-Blanc & Faouzi Souissi, 2026. "Do sovereign ratings capture public pension liabilities in the assessment of public debt? A France–UK comparison," Post-Print hal-05802254, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05802254
    DOI: 10.1080/09540962.2026.2743155
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05802254. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.