Author
Listed:
- Tekeoh Seraphine Anong
(Pan African Institute for Development West Africa, Buea, Cameroon.)
- Abonwi Chenaa Takwa
(Pan African Institute for Development West Africa, Buea, Cameroon.)
Abstract
This research examined the relationships between selected sustainability strategies and the organisational sustainability of civil society organisations (CSOs) in Douala IV Municipality, Cameroon. More specifically, the study examined the relationships between funding diversification, strategic partnerships, community engagement, capacity building, impact measurement, adaptive capacity, and organisational sustainability. A quantitative research methodology and a cross-sectional research design were used. Data were collected using structured questionnaires from 100 respondents working in CSOs in the study area. Data analysis included descriptive statistics and Pearson product-moment correlation analysis at the 0.05 level of significance. Statistically significant positive associations were found between funding diversification and organisational sustainability (r = .597, p < .001), capacity building and organisational sustainability (r = .573, p < .001), and impact measurement and organisational sustainability (r = .440, p < .001). No statistically significant associations were found between strategic partnerships (r = .187, p = .062), community engagement (r = −.102, p = .312), or adaptation to changing contexts (r = .187, p = .062) and organisational sustainability. The null hypotheses concerning funding diversification, capacity building, and impact measurement were therefore rejected, whereas those concerning strategic partnerships, community engagement, and adaptation to changing contexts were retained. The results indicate that CSO sustainability in the study context is associated mainly with the ability of organisations to diversify financial resources, develop internal organisational capacities, and use impact measurement systematically. The study was limited to CSOs in Douala IV Municipality and employed a cross-sectional correlational design; therefore, the findings are context-specific and should be interpreted as evidence of association rather than causality.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05798947. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.