Author
Listed:
- Maho Nakagawa
(CESAER - Centre d'économie et de sociologie rurales appliquées à l'agriculture et aux espaces ruraux - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement - Institut Agro Dijon - Institut Agro - Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement)
- Mathieu Lefebvre
(BETA - Bureau d'Économie Théorique et Appliquée - AgroParisTech - UNISTRA - Université de Strasbourg - Université de Haute-Alsace (UHA) - Université de Haute-Alsace (UHA) Mulhouse - Colmar - UL - Université de Lorraine - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement)
- Anne Stenger
(BETA - Bureau d'Économie Théorique et Appliquée - AgroParisTech - UNISTRA - Université de Strasbourg - Université de Haute-Alsace (UHA) - Université de Haute-Alsace (UHA) Mulhouse - Colmar - UL - Université de Lorraine - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement)
- Astrid Sturm
(BTU - Brandenburg University of Technology [Cottbus – Senftenberg])
- Frank Wätzold
(BTU - Brandenburg University of Technology [Cottbus – Senftenberg])
Abstract
Economic experiments related to biodiversity conservation policies provide valuable insights into how individuals respond to specific policy designs. However, they provide limited guidance on how to design cost-effective conservation policies at the landscape level. Ecological-economic models - integrating ecological dynamics with economic decision-making in optimization procedures - are well-suited to this purpose. Yet they nearly always assume purely profit-maximizing behaviour, overlooking deviations from this behaviour observed in practice. Our methodological aim is to combine these two approaches by incorporating behavioural data from a charitable-giving based laboratory experiment with student participants into an established decision-support software based on an ecological-economic model. We empirically explore how pro-environmental motives might influence participation in agri-environment schemes (AES) through decision support software applied to meadow bird conservation. Adjusting the modelling procedure to reflect intrinsic motives, we compare outcomes with those generated under standard profit-maximization assumption. The results indicate that while behavioural motives can increase participation, their overall impact on cost-effective AES design recommendations remain modest.
Suggested Citation
Maho Nakagawa & Mathieu Lefebvre & Anne Stenger & Astrid Sturm & Frank Wätzold, 2026.
"Combining economic experiments and ecological-economic modelling: application to agri-environment schemes for biodiversity conservation,"
Post-Print
hal-05772199, HAL.
Handle:
RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05772199
DOI: 10.1080/21606544.2026.2694359
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05772199. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.