Author
Listed:
- John Kwesi Erbynn
(SS&C Technologies Holdings Inc, USA.)
- Doreen Appiah
(Bowling Green State University, Ohio, USA.)
- Adwoa Agyeiwaa Ampomah-Britwum
(Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, KNUST, Kumasi, Ghana.)
Abstract
Financial transaction monitoring is increasingly expected to identify anomalous and potentially fraudulent activity while transactions are still operationally actionable. This requirement is more demanding than conventional offline classification because the detector is embedded in an unbounded, distributed stream in which class prevalence is extreme, labels are delayed or selectively verified, behaviour changes over time, and feature state may be distributed across machines. This critical narrative review synthesises evidence on machine-learning methods, data-stream adaptation, distributed stream processing, operational evaluation, privacy, explainability and adversarial reliability. Literature published from 1 January 2000 to 19 July 2026 was considered, with emphasis on peer-reviewed studies that illuminate realistic transaction-stream conditions. The evidence indicates that effective real-time detection depends less on a single algorithmic family than on alignment among behavioural representation, temporal validation, adaptive learning, stateful stream semantics, decision thresholds and investigation capacity. Supervised tree and ensemble approaches remain strong operational baselines when labels and engineered behavioural features are available; sequential, unsupervised and graph-based methods add value when temporal or relational context is material, but their deployment benefits are often less well established than benchmark gains. Concept drift and verification latency create a persistent mismatch between current transactions and historical labels, while distributed execution introduces correctness risks through late events, replay, stale features and recovery. Accuracy-centred evaluation is therefore inadequate: precision-recall behaviour, calibration, cost, alert capacity, end-to-end latency, throughput and recovery characteristics should be assessed together under temporal replay. Privacy-preserving collaboration and explainability can support governance, but neither federated learning nor post-hoc explanation resolves the underlying problems of heterogeneity, security and decision accountability. The review concludes that the main research priority is integrated statistical-systems evaluation using realistic, replayable streams with delayed feedback and explicit service-level constraints. Such evaluation would make apparent whether an apparent modelling improvement survives the conditions that determine operational value.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05771009. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.