IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05758058.html

Legitimacy work in hybrid coalitions: the case of platform co-operatives in France

Author

Listed:
  • Müge Özman

    (LITEM - Laboratoire en Innovation, Technologies, Economie et Management (EA 7363) - UEVE - Université d'Évry-Val-d'Essonne - Université Paris-Saclay - IMT-BS - Institut Mines-Télécom Business School - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris], IMT-BS - MMS - Département Management, Marketing et Stratégie - TEM - Télécom Ecole de Management - IMT-BS - Institut Mines-Télécom Business School - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris])

  • Mélissa Boudes

    (LITEM - Laboratoire en Innovation, Technologies, Economie et Management (EA 7363) - UEVE - Université d'Évry-Val-d'Essonne - Université Paris-Saclay - IMT-BS - Institut Mines-Télécom Business School - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris], ARGUMans - Laboratoire de recherche en gestion Le Mans Université - UM - Le Mans Université)

  • Cynthia Srnec

    (THEMA - Théorie économique, modélisation et applications - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - CY - CY Cergy Paris Université)

Abstract

Collective legitimacy work poses challenges distinct from those faced by single organizations. Coalitions of heterogeneous actors must coordinate legitimacy strategies across members while projecting coherent claims externally. Yet existing research offers limited guidance on how these tensions are managed. Digital platform cooperatives (DPCs), which aim to offer a more democratic alternative to the sharing economy, exemplify this challenge. Facing barriers to legitimacy in markets dominated by investor-owned platforms, they increasingly pursue legitimacy work collectively rather than individually. This paper examines how DPCs engage in collective legitimacy work through Plateformes en Communs (PeC), a French meta-organization coordinating diverse DPCs and allied actors. Drawing on an in-depth longitudinal case study, we show that divergences among coalition members structure four strategic spheres of legitimacy work, at the intersection of two domains, economic and sociopolitical, and two strategies, conformance and manipulation. PeC's legitimacy strategies are mediated by tensions between heterogeneous members and external stakeholder demands, and we treat the discursive practices through which these strategies are enacted as traces of legitimacy work. Our findings contribute to research on hybrid organizations, cooperatives, and institutional work, highlighting the critical role of boundary spanners, internal cohesion, and collective infrastructure in advancing cooperative alternatives in the digital economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Müge Özman & Mélissa Boudes & Cynthia Srnec, 2026. "Legitimacy work in hybrid coalitions: the case of platform co-operatives in France," Post-Print hal-05758058, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05758058
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jcom.2026.100305
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05758058. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.