IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05757732.html

Unveiling how belief and boundary controls shape organizational citizenship behaviors and withdrawal cognitions in government: a test of mediating and moderating effects

Author

Listed:
  • Walid Cheffi

    (Pôle Finance Responsable - Rouen Business School - Rouen Business School, College of business administration - University of Dubaï)

  • Billel Ferhani

    (SUAD_SAFIR - SUAD - Sorbonne University Abu Dhabi, PRISM Sorbonne - Pôle de recherche interdisciplinaire en sciences du management - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne, SUAD - Sorbonne University Abu Dhabi)

  • Maryam Saleem
  • Mirghani Ahmed

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to examine how belief and boundary controls influence managers' withdrawal cognitions in the governmental sector. Drawing on person-organization fit theory, it investigates the mediating role of organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) and the moderating role of allocentrism. Design/methodology/approach This study develops and tests a moderated mediation model using survey data collected from managers working in governmental organizations in the United Arab Emirates. Structural equation modeling is employed to examine the direct, indirect and conditional relationships among the study variables. Findings The results indicate that belief systems and boundary controls positively influence OCB, which in turn reduces managers' withdrawal cognitions. OCB fully mediates the relationship between belief systems and withdrawal cognitions and partially mediates the relationship between boundary controls and withdrawal cognitions, highlighting its role as a key behavioral mechanism through which management control systems shape employee attitudes. Furthermore, allocentrism significantly moderates the OCB-withdrawal cognitions relationship, such that the protective effect of OCB is weaker among highly allocentric managers, suggesting that discretionary behaviors may be perceived as social obligations rather than voluntary contributions. Research limitations/implications This study extends management control research by identifying withdrawal cognitions as an important behavioral outcome of belief and boundary controls. It also advances person-organization fit theory by explaining how management controls foster discretionary behaviors that strengthen employee attachment to public organizations. Practical implications The findings suggest that public organizations can reduce withdrawal cognitions by strengthening belief and boundary controls that encourage OCB and reinforce alignment between employees and organizational values. Originality/value This study innovates by examining the behavioral effects of belief and boundary control systems on withdrawal cognitions through OCB in a public sector context, highlighting the contingent role of allocentrism in shaping these relationships.

Suggested Citation

  • Walid Cheffi & Billel Ferhani & Maryam Saleem & Mirghani Ahmed, 2026. "Unveiling how belief and boundary controls shape organizational citizenship behaviors and withdrawal cognitions in government: a test of mediating and moderating effects," Post-Print hal-05757732, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05757732
    DOI: 10.1108/JAOC-01-2026-0062
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05757732. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.