Author
Abstract
Aim: This laboratory study compared the colourfastness of three black-and-white 100% cotton Printex fabric finishes (plain, embossed, and plissé) after three washing exposures with Key Soap and a Ghana Standards Authority reference soap (Standard Soap). Methodology: The colourfastness component comprised 18 specimens representing three fabric finishes, two soap systems, and three washing exposures corresponding to 30, 60, and 90 min. Colour change was assessed against unwashed controls using the ISO Grey Scale for assessing change in colour. Three observers evaluated the washed and control specimens. The primary interpretation was descriptive. The one-way ANOVA values reported in the original analytical summary are retained as exploratory because the colourfastness subset contained one specimen per finish × soap × washing-duration condition. Results: With Key Soap, all finishes were rated 4–5 after 30 min; after 60 min, the embossed finish declined to 4; and after 90 min, the plain and plissé finishes were rated 4 while the embossed finish was rated 3. Under the study's predefined pass criterion of at least 3–4, only the embossed finish under Key Soap at 90 min fell below the criterion. With Standard Soap, all recorded ratings remained at or above 3–4 across the three washing exposures, although the pattern was not strictly monotonic. Exploratory ANOVA values were p = .42 for Key Soap and p = .03 for Standard Soap; these p-values are not treated as confirmatory evidence because independent replication at each experimental cell was not available. Conclusion: Within the tested fabrics and laboratory conditions, colour retention varied with fabric finish, washing exposure, and soap product. The most pronounced colour loss occurred for the embossed fabric washed with Key Soap for 90 min. The findings support product- and finish-specific care recommendations, while broader claims about detergent chemistry or general detergent superiority require replicated testing and direct chemical characterization.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05744712. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.