Author
Listed:
- Jana Poláková
(Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources - CZU - Czech University of Life Sciences Prague)
- Martin Hvarregaard Thorsøe
(Department of Agroecology - Aarhus University [Aarhus])
- Adam Svoboda
(Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources - CZU - Czech University of Life Sciences Prague)
- Silvia Coderoni
(Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy and Faculty of Bioscience and Agro-Food and Environmental Technology, Campus Universitario di Coste Sant' Agostino, University of Teramo, Teramo, Italy.)
- Laure Bamière
(UMR PSAE - Paris-Saclay Applied Economics - AgroParisTech - Université Paris-Saclay - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement)
- Kamel Louhichi
(UMR PSAE - Paris-Saclay Applied Economics - AgroParisTech - Université Paris-Saclay - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement)
- Katarina Elofsson
(ENVS - Department of Environmental Science [Roskilde] - Aarhus University [Aarhus])
- Paolo Sckokai
(Department of Agricultural and Food Economics - Unicatt - Università cattolica del Sacro Cuore [Piacenza e Cremona])
- Berit Hasler
(Department of Food and Resource Economics - ITU - IT University of Copenhagen)
- Greet Ruysschaert
(ILVO - Research Institute for Agricultural, Fisheries and Food)
Abstract
This study reviews and compares the financial mechanisms required to support verifiable agricultural soil carbon stocks under the European Green Deal. It examines monitoring, reporting, and verification (MRV) systems for soil carbon removals and emission reduction through carbon farming (CF) projects, exploring how financial mechanisms can be designed to support rigorous measurement while ensuring economic viability for land managers. The review identifies a central accuracy–cost paradox: while result-based MRV systems require high-precision monitoring for credibility, they increase implementation costs that create barriers to farmer participation. Upfront financial burdens and deferred rewards make result-based mechanisms alone insufficient to drive adoption. A policy mix involving public, private, and civic resources is essential for mitigating CF project implementation costs and managing risks related to regulatory additionality. For example, the findings indicate that result-based CF projects will likely need complementary support, including publicly funded CF advisory services that reduce participation barriers by addressing farmers' information gaps associated with MRV. Collective monitoring arrangements distribute fixed MRV costs and improve economic viability for small-scale farmers, though institutional conditions for equitable aggregation require clarification. Blended financing combining public budgets, private markets, advisory support, and cost pooling addresses the accuracy–cost paradox more effectively than single-instrument policies. The findings demonstrate that effective soil carbon sequestration requires realigned governance structures that explicitly integrate MRV financing into CF project design. This enables the agricultural sector to scale up carbon removal and advance SDG13 (Climate Action) and European climate neutrality targets.
Suggested Citation
Jana Poláková & Martin Hvarregaard Thorsøe & Adam Svoboda & Silvia Coderoni & Laure Bamière & Kamel Louhichi & Katarina Elofsson & Paolo Sckokai & Berit Hasler & Greet Ruysschaert, 2026.
"MRV financing under EU carbon farming governance: a review [Le financement des mécanismes MRV dans le cadre de la gouvernance européenne en matière d'agriculture carbone : une analyse],"
Post-Print
hal-05741920, HAL.
Handle:
RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05741920
DOI: 10.3389/fclim.2026.1835304
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05741920. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.