Author
Listed:
- Leo Santiago Iii Arrabaca
(Faculty School of Business and Management, Xavier University – Ateneo de Cagayan, Corrales Avenue, Cagayan de Oro, Misamis Oriental, 9000, Philippines.)
Abstract
Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has emerged as a significant governance concern for higher education institutions, necessitating attention to responsible technology use, organisational capability, governance structures, resources, and ongoing oversight. This study investigates the institutionalisation of GenAI governance through a management-oriented qualitative document analysis of three documents from a focal higher education institution. Using the Technology–Organization–Environment (TOE) framework, the study identifies governance commitments articulated in the institution's AI policy and examines the technological, organisational, and environmental conditions influencing these commitments. The analysis employs a 13-construct TOE codebook to examine the institution's GenAI policy, the establishment of its responsible AI committee, and an earlier memorandum on AI in teaching and learning. The results demonstrate that the institution's governance response evolved through a progression from capability development to the establishment of formal governance structures and policy formalisation. Technological conditions created opportunities and practical requirements for GenAI governance, while organisational conditions—particularly leadership, structure, competence, resources, and readiness—were most extensively documented. Environmental conditions primarily defined regulatory and institutional boundaries. The findings indicate that GenAI governance becomes institutionalised not solely through policy formulation, but through organisational capacity to translate technological change into assigned responsibilities, coordinated structures, and sustained oversight. This study advances higher education management and AI governance by extending the TOE framework to institutional governance and by identifying a capability–structure–formalisation pattern for understanding how AI governance becomes embedded within university organisational arrangements.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05741894. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.