IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05736653.html

Policy layering in EU carbon farming governance: insights from eight EU Member States
[La superposition des politiques dans la gouvernance de l'agriculture carbone au sein de l'UE : enseignements tirés de huit États membres de l'UE]

Author

Listed:
  • Susanna Esther Hönle

    (HU Berlin - Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin = Humboldt University of Berlin = Université Humboldt de Berlin)

  • Claudia Heidecke

    (Coordination Unit Climate, Soil, Biodiversity - Thuenen-Institute)

  • Laure Bamière

    (UMR PSAE - Paris-Saclay Applied Economics - AgroParisTech - Université Paris-Saclay - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement)

  • Ennio Facq

    (Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food)

  • Ilaria Falconi

    (CREA - Consiglio per la Ricerca in Agricoltura e l’analisi dell’economia agraria = Council for Agricultural Research and Economics)

  • Frederik Gerits

    (Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food)

  • Morten Graversgaard

    (Department of Agroecology - Aarhus University [Aarhus])

  • Jana Poláková

    (Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources - CZU - Czech University of Life Sciences Prague)

  • Albert Bene Smit

    (WUR - Wageningen University and Research [Wageningen])

  • Martin Hvarregaard Thorsøe

    (Department of Agroecology - Aarhus University [Aarhus])

Abstract

Carbon farming has become an increasingly prominent concept in European climate and agricultural policy, particularly in the context of efforts to strengthen carbon removals from the land sector. In parallel, the European Union adopted the Carbon Removals and Carbon Farming Regulation (CRCF) in 2024, adding a new certification-based governance layer to an already dense landscape of public agricultural support instruments and diverse private initiatives. This article examines how this evolving policy field is perceived by national experts across eight EU Member States. Drawing on expert survey data collected in 2023, we analyse expert perceptions of carbon farming relevance, the potential and barriers of different practices, the status of monitoring, reporting and verification, and expectations regarding private initiatives. The results indicate that carbon-farming-related practices are currently supported mainly through existing CAP instruments rather than through coherent stand-alone carbon-farming strategies, and that inventory visibility of these measures remains limited and highly heterogeneous across countries. We interpret these patterns as indications of policy layering, in which new governance instruments are being added to established agricultural and climate policy architectures, without changing the existing policy structure. The type of layering varies by dimension: while some complementarities between CAP and CRCF incentives for farmers exist, the absence of reliable demand structures for CRCF credits and structural incompatibilities between CRCF certification and national climate accounting systems point towards an inefficient outcome and counter-productive layering, respectively. Unless these challenges are addressed, the CRCF risks remaining a layered instrument without real integration into national policy frameworks and with low climate impact.

Suggested Citation

  • Susanna Esther Hönle & Claudia Heidecke & Laure Bamière & Ennio Facq & Ilaria Falconi & Frederik Gerits & Morten Graversgaard & Jana Poláková & Albert Bene Smit & Martin Hvarregaard Thorsøe, 2026. "Policy layering in EU carbon farming governance: insights from eight EU Member States [La superposition des politiques dans la gouvernance de l'agriculture carbone au sein de l'UE : enseignements tirés de huit États membres de l'UE]," Post-Print hal-05736653, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05736653
    DOI: 10.1186/s12302-026-01475-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05736653. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.