Author
Listed:
- Muhammed Zakir Hossain
(Associate Professor, Department of Business Studies, State University of Bangladesh, Bangladesh)
- Md. Jobaer Rahman Rashed
(Humphrey School of Public Affairs, University of Minnesota, USA)
- Annatul Islam Hredoy
(Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55454, USA.)
- Fariha Tazin
(Assistant Professor, Department of Business Studies, State University of Bangladesh, Bangladesh)
Abstract
Sustainability reporting has emerged as a crucial aspect of corporate accountability, driven by stakeholders' growing demand for reliable, transparent, and decision-useful environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosures. Nonetheless, issues regarding the precision of sustainability reporting remain significant, especially in developing economies like Bangladesh, where regulatory enforcement is still in progress. This study examines the impact of three essential governance mechanisms—board independence (BI), audit committee effectiveness (ACE), and internal control strength (ICS)—on the accuracy of sustainability reporting (SRA). A structured questionnaire was distributed to professionals in corporate governance across various industries, resulting in 170 valid responses. Employing SPSS version 26, the correlation analysis indicated moderate to strong positive associations between each governance mechanism and SRA. The most significant correlation was found for ACE (r = 0.522), followed by ICS (r = 0.487) and BI (r = 0.451). Regression analysis indicated that all three governance mechanisms are significant predictors of sustainability reporting accuracy: BI (β = 0.241, p < 0.01), ACE (β = 0.314, p < 0.01), and ICS (β = 0.287, p < 0.01). The governance variables together account for 47.3% of the variance in SRA (R2 = 0.473), highlighting a significant impact of governance on reporting reliability. The results provide strong empirical support for the hypothesis that companies with enhanced governance frameworks—marked by independent oversight, efficient audit committees, and robust internal controls—tend to produce precise and trustworthy sustainability disclosures. This study underscores the critical role of governance quality in bolstering reporting integrity. It provides actionable insights for policymakers, corporate boards, and regulatory bodies seeking to improve the accuracy of sustainability reporting in emerging markets.
Suggested Citation
Muhammed Zakir Hossain & Md. Jobaer Rahman Rashed & Annatul Islam Hredoy & Fariha Tazin, 2026.
"Corporate Governance Quality and Its Influence on Sustainability Reporting Accuracy,"
Post-Print
hal-05736594, HAL.
Handle:
RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05736594
DOI: 10.59324/ejiss.2026.2(1).04
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05736594. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.