IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05732309.html

Functional sufficiency in VR: achieving non-corporeal embodiment

Author

Listed:
  • Malcolm Wright

  • Olivia Petit

    (Kedge BS - Kedge Business School)

  • Alexander Schnack

Abstract

This article provides a novel functionalist account of embodiment in immersive virtual environments, grounded in a formal model of cognition, supported by past empirical evidence, and offering a testable framework for predicting when virtual experiences will produce cognitive and emotional effects. Our approach complements existing work on telepresence and subjective experience by applying the Thin Model as an intermediate theory linking interface affordances to perception, emotion, and behavior. Drawing on previously published immersive virtual reality studies, we show that when key functional elements - such as sensing, recognition, inspection, and feedback - are preserved, behavioral and emotional outcomes remain stable even when locomotion mechanisms differ. These findings support a criterion of functional sufficiency for embodiment where interface substitution leaves core policies of action unchanged. We outline a set of theory-driven tests to identify the limits of this invariance and argue that embodiment should be defined by the integrity of the perception–action loop, not by anatomical mimicry.

Suggested Citation

  • Malcolm Wright & Olivia Petit & Alexander Schnack, 2026. "Functional sufficiency in VR: achieving non-corporeal embodiment," Post-Print hal-05732309, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05732309
    DOI: 10.3389/fnsys.2026.1778604
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05732309v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-05732309v1/document
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3389/fnsys.2026.1778604?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05732309. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.