IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05731801.html

A Different Kind of Trust: Cross‐Cultural Evidence of Trust Through Self‐Expansion

Author

Listed:
  • Saïd Shafa

    (University of Melbourne)

  • Jimena Ramirez-Marin

    (Vlerick Business School (Belgium, Ghent))

Abstract

Extending prior research on cultural differences in interpersonal trust, we propose that the relationship between culture and trust is influenced by self‐expansion relative to the trust target. Across three studies with mixed methodologies, we assessed cultural differences in how the nature of the relationship between individuals shapes self‐expansion and interpersonal trust. In Study 1, building on the framework of cultural logics associated with honor, dignity, and face, our analysis of data from the World Values Survey showed that trust varies across cultures depending on the social relationship between trustor and a trustee (N = 64,167). In Study 2, we demonstrate that cultures differ in the extent to which they report self‐expansion with targets to which they hold different levels of social relationships and that these differences closely match the trust patterns established in Study 1. Finally, in a pre‐registered experimental study, we tie these findings together by showing that cultural norms predict levels of trust through the amount of self‐expansion people report with the trust target in a Trust game. Our research qualifies previous findings on cultural differences in interpersonal trust, especially in so‐called "low trust societies," and contributes to our understanding of the role of self‐expansion in trust across cultures.

Suggested Citation

  • Saïd Shafa & Jimena Ramirez-Marin, 2026. "A Different Kind of Trust: Cross‐Cultural Evidence of Trust Through Self‐Expansion," Post-Print hal-05731801, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05731801
    DOI: 10.1111/jasp.70036
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05731801. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.