Author
Listed:
- Hafidh Ali Hafidh
(Faculty of Finance and Administrative Sciences, Al-Madinah International University (MEDIU), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.)
- Mazen Mohammed Farea
(Faculty of Finance and Administrative Sciences, Al-Madinah International University (MEDIU), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.)
Abstract
Entrepreneurship research has long debated whether the financial performance returns to strategic practices differ according to the gender of the decision-maker who enacts it, and the accumulated evidence remains mixed. This study tests whether owner–manager gender moderates the effects of strategic planning, business innovation strategy, and market adaptation strategy on the financial performance of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Data were collected during the February–May 2026 fieldwork period from 350 SME owners and managers in Zanzibar, evenly divided between men and women (175 each), and analysed using bootstrapped regression with a permutation-based two-group comparison (5,000 permutations), preceded by a formal assessment of measurement invariance. In the pooled sample, strategic planning (β = 0.172), business innovation strategy (β = 0.236), and market adaptation strategy (β = 0.192) each significantly predicted financial performance (R² = 0.116). Business innovation strategy and market adaptation strategy showed no significant gender differences in their effects (permutation p = .747 and .864). Strategic planning showed a descriptively larger effect among women (β = 0.268, p < .001) than among men (β = 0.096, p = .194); however, the permutation test for this difference did not reach conventional significance (p = .079). The findings indicate gender-invariant financial returns to business innovation and market adaptation, while the relative importance of strategic planning for women warrants targeted investigation with larger samples. The study contributes gender-disaggregated evidence from an under-researched African island economy and supports gender-neutral innovation and adaptation training alongside further evaluation of structured planning support.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05727117. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.