IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05724259.html

Leadership for quality and innovation: a cross-cultural meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Younès El Manzani

    (Université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ - Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, LAREQUOI - Laboratoire de recherche en Management - UVSQ - Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines)

  • Khalil Aït Saïd

    (LAREQUOI - Laboratoire de recherche en Management - UVSQ - Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines)

  • Zakaria Elkhwesky

Abstract

Sustaining a quality advantage while continuously innovating remains a central challenge for organizations operating in turbulent environments. This study advances the literature through a meta-analysis of 82 effect sizes drawn from 47 independent studies (N = 20,589) examining the relationship between leadership for quality (LfQ) and innovation. The findings reveal a strong, positive association between LfQ and all types of innovation, with particularly pronounced associations for administrative and green innovation. Moreover, LfQ is positively associated with both incremental and radical innovation, as well as with innovation capabilities and innovation performance. Meta-regression analysis further demonstrates that national cultural dimensions systematically moderate the LfQ-innovation relationship: power distance, uncertainty avoidance, and long-term orientation strengthen this relationship, whereas individualism weakens it. Collectively, the results position LfQ as a critical organizational capability for reconciling exploitation and exploration, highlighting a culturally contingent pathway through which quality management fosters innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Younès El Manzani & Khalil Aït Saïd & Zakaria Elkhwesky, 2026. "Leadership for quality and innovation: a cross-cultural meta-analysis," Post-Print hal-05724259, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05724259
    DOI: 10.1080/14783363.2026.2690021
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05724259. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.