IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05723855.html

Employment Type, Gender, and Earnings Inequality among Rural Agricultural Workers in Telangana: A Cross-sectional Data Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Ramavath Kavitha

    (Department of Economics, Central University of Kerala, Kasaragod, Kerala, India.)

  • Syam Prasad

    (Department of Economics, Central University of Kerala, Kasaragod, Kerala, India.)

  • Mudavath Paramesh

    (Department of Public Administration and Policy Studies, Central University of Kerala, Kasaragod, Kerala, India.)

Abstract

Aims: This study examines earnings inequality among rural agricultural workers in Telangana by analysing the associations of employment type, gender, age, and education with monthly labour earnings. Study Design: Cross-sectional quantitative study. Place and Duration of Study: The study uses unit-level data from the Periodic Labour Force Survey (PLFS) 2023–24 conducted by the Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation (MoSPI), Government of India. Methodology: The study analyses rural agricultural workers engaged in self-employment and casual labour. Monthly labour earnings were classified into three mutually exclusive categories: Zero Earnings, ₹1–5,000, and above ₹5,000. Multinomial Logistic Regression, Average Marginal Effects, and Predicted Probability analyses were employed to examine the associations between individual characteristics, employment type, and earnings outcomes. Results: Employment type exhibited the strongest association with earnings outcomes. Compared with self-employed workers, casual labourers had substantially higher odds of being in both the ₹1–5,000 category (β = 4.138, p < 0.001) and the Above ₹5,000 category (β = 4.120, p < 0.001), relative to the Zero Earnings category. Senior workers had significantly lower odds of earning above ₹5,000 than younger workers (β = −1.211, p < 0.01). Higher education was negatively associated with the ₹1–5,000 and above ₹5,000 categories. Gender was significantly associated with the ₹1–5,000 category, while the gender difference in the Above ₹5,000 category was not statistically significant at the 5 per cent level. Predicted probabilities further indicated that employment type was more strongly associated with the probability of earning above ₹5,000 than gender. Conclusion: The findings show that employment type has a stronger association with earnings than gender among rural agricultural workers in Telangana. The study highlights the need to strengthen income security for self-employed and unpaid family workers, expand productive employment opportunities, and improve access to social protection. These findings are consistent with Labour Market Segmentation Theory and provide useful policy insights for promoting inclusive rural development in Telangana.

Suggested Citation

  • Ramavath Kavitha & Syam Prasad & Mudavath Paramesh, 2026. "Employment Type, Gender, and Earnings Inequality among Rural Agricultural Workers in Telangana: A Cross-sectional Data Analysis," Post-Print hal-05723855, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05723855
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05723855. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.