IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05721850.html

Neoliberal governance, evaluations, and the rise of win–win ideology in corporate responsibility discourse, 1960–2010

Author

Listed:
  • Christof Brandtner

    (EM - EMLyon Business School)

  • Patricia Bromley

    (Stanford University)

Abstract

Despite conflicts between social and economic goals, contemporary US firms routinely depict such aims as synergistic. Analyzing 300 annual reports from a sample of 80 large US public firms between 1960 and 2010, we examine the rise of ‘win–win' conceptions of corporate responsibility (CR), which include both the social benefits of economic activities and economic gains from social responsibility. Our findings support arguments that the rise of win–win ideology in large corporations is tied to the emergence of neoliberal governance in society. Indicators of firms' changing institutional context include financialization, numbers of non-profit organizations and voluntary regulation schemes. However, the macroeffect is mediated by firm attention to these institutional changes; mentions of external evaluations in annual reports are associated with higher levels of win–win ideology. The study contributes to institutional theories of the historical development of CR and to understanding heterogeneous organizational responses to societal-level institutional change.

Suggested Citation

  • Christof Brandtner & Patricia Bromley, 2022. "Neoliberal governance, evaluations, and the rise of win–win ideology in corporate responsibility discourse, 1960–2010," Post-Print hal-05721850, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05721850
    DOI: 10.1093/ser/mwab001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05721850. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.