Author
Abstract
This study presents a comparative analysis of the Nigerian and Indian entrepreneurial ecosystems with a view to examining venture creation, access to capital, and the effects of the broader ecosystem on startup development. The secondary comparison of India and Nigeria highlights the relevance of policy constraints to entrepreneurial activities in both countries, including regulatory and funding constraints and inadequate infrastructure. Nevertheless, despite these barriers, Nigerian and Indian entrepreneurs have been successful in developing business models suited to local contexts and implementing novel strategies to overcome these barriers. Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Theory was adopted as the theoretical framework for this study, providing a comprehensive means of examining external factors such as access to capital, mentorship, and policies affecting startup growth. The study adopted a qualitative research design based on secondary sources. Findings were drawn from research published in peer-reviewed journals, governmental reports, and empirical studies published between 2019 and 2024. Thematic content analysis was used to develop a comprehensive thematic profile of the Nigerian and Indian ecosystems, identifying recurrent themes relating to governmental policies, funding, and mentorship in both countries. The comparison revealed both similarities and differences, indicating that, although Nigeria is currently strengthening its entrepreneurial ecosystem, India presently has a highly developed entrepreneurial ecosystem that offers greater access to capital through venture capital and angel investor schemes. Both countries, however, need to address issues of equity and inclusiveness affecting vulnerable groups and rural entrepreneurs. The study identifies access to capital as a key factor in startup development in both countries. It therefore recommends improvements to the regulatory framework in Nigeria, increased access to venture creation funding and entrepreneurial networks in Nigeria, and a focus in India on reducing the rural-urban disparity in access to capital.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05719544. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.