IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05714561.html

Flux Capacity and Structural Entropy

Author

Listed:
  • May Chidiac

    (LU / ULB - الجامعة اللبنانية [بيروت] = Lebanese University [Beirut] = Université libanaise [Beyrouth])

  • Mireille Chidiac El Hajj

    (LU / ULB - الجامعة اللبنانية [بيروت] = Lebanese University [Beirut] = Université libanaise [Beyrouth], CRIISEA - Centre de Recherche sur les Institutions, l'Industrie et les Systèmes Économiques d'Amiens - UR UPJV 3908 - UPJV - Université de Picardie Jules Verne)

Abstract

Political accountability in fragile states is often symbolic rather than transformative. This study examines why increased digital civic engagement and media exposure fail to generate systemic political reform in Lebanon. Using a sequential explanatory mixed-methods design, it combines a nationwide survey of 882 adults with in-depth interviews to analyze accountability dynamics amid prolonged institutional collapse. Results show that partisan media exposure strengthens trust in sectarian elites ( = 0.45) while reducing perceived urgency for reform, reinforcing political inertia. In contrast, engagement with non-partisan media promotes adaptive civic participation through Flux Capacity, defined as individuals' ability to sustain engagement under structural uncertainty ( = 0.28). Qualitative findings reveal that citizens navigate systemic disorder (Structural Entropy) by curating information, pacing engagement, and tolerating ambiguity. The study confirms an Accountability Paradox whereby digital media imposes reputational costs on elites ( = 0.49) without producing policy change. Rather than disrupting extractive systems, digital media stabilizes political endurance in fragile contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • May Chidiac & Mireille Chidiac El Hajj, 2026. "Flux Capacity and Structural Entropy," Post-Print hal-05714561, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05714561
    DOI: 10.1163/17550920-bja00112
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05714561. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.