IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05704164.html

Comparative Study of the Cost, Profit Margin, and Effectiveness of Locally Formulated Feeds Against Industrially Manufactured Broiler Feeds for Establishing an Entrepreneurship (Feeds Formulation) Venture

Author

Listed:
  • Luka Yilgwan Wetben

    (Department of Business and Entrepreneurship Education, Federal University of Education Pankshin, Plateau State, Nigeria)

  • Ibrahim Mohammed Yahaya

    (Department of Business and Entrepreneurship Education, Federal University of Education Pankshin, Plateau State, Nigeria)

Abstract

The high cost of poultry feed, which accounts for a substantial proportion of production expenses, remains a major challenge to profitable broiler production, particularly in developing economies. This study investigated the comparative cost, profit margin, and effectiveness of locally formulated feeds against industrially manufactured broiler feeds, with the aim of establishing a viable entrepreneurship venture in feed formulation. The study was conducted in Pankshin Local Government Area of Plateau State, Nigeria, using a completely randomized design involving fifty (50) day-old broiler chicks divided into two groups. Group A was fed industrially manufactured feed, while Group B received locally formulated feed prepared from readily available ingredients. Data on body weight, feed cost, market price, and profit were collected and analyzed using descriptive statistics and independent samples t-test at a 5% significance level. Results showed that broilers fed industrial feed attained significantly higher mean body weight (4.54 kg) compared to those fed locally formulated feed (2.93 kg) (t = 6.91, p < 0.001), indicating superior growth performance. Similarly, the mean market price (in Nigerian currency - Naira, ₦) of broilers fed industrial feed (₦14,714) was significantly higher than that of those fed locally formulated feed (₦13,428) (t = 2.08, p < 0.05). However, profitability analysis revealed that broilers fed locally formulated feed yielded significantly higher mean profit (₦10,371) compared to those fed industrial feed (₦4,767) (t = -9.05, p < 0.001), largely due to the substantially lower cost of feed production. The findings demonstrate a clear trade-off between biological performance and economic efficiency. While industrial feeds enhance growth performance and market value, locally formulated feeds provide superior economic returns. This study concludes that locally formulated feeds offer a sustainable and profitable alternative for poultry production and present a viable pathway for entrepreneurship development, particularly in resource-constrained settings. It is recommended that improvements in local feed formulation be pursued to optimize both growth performance and profitability.

Suggested Citation

  • Luka Yilgwan Wetben & Ibrahim Mohammed Yahaya, 2026. "Comparative Study of the Cost, Profit Margin, and Effectiveness of Locally Formulated Feeds Against Industrially Manufactured Broiler Feeds for Establishing an Entrepreneurship (Feeds Formulation) Venture," Post-Print hal-05704164, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05704164
    DOI: 10.59324/ejmeb.2026.3(3).08
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05704164. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.