Author
Listed:
- Thomas Teychenié
(TSM - Toulouse School of Management Research - UT Capitole - Université Toulouse Capitole - Comue de Toulouse - Communauté d'universités et établissements de Toulouse - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - TSM - Toulouse School of Management - UT Capitole - Université Toulouse Capitole - Comue de Toulouse - Communauté d'universités et établissements de Toulouse)
- Julien Cloarec
(UJML - Université Jean Moulin - Lyon 3 - Université de Lyon)
- Lars Meyer-Waarden
(TSM - Toulouse School of Management Research - UT Capitole - Université Toulouse Capitole - Comue de Toulouse - Communauté d'universités et établissements de Toulouse - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - TSM - Toulouse School of Management - UT Capitole - Université Toulouse Capitole - Comue de Toulouse - Communauté d'universités et établissements de Toulouse)
Abstract
We conducted a large-scale, tri-national experiment drawing on the Moral Machine clusters—Western individualist (U.S.), Latin-American transitional (Mexico), and East Asian collectivist (China)—to examine how autonomy level (SAE Level 2 vs. Level 5), moral programming (self-protective vs. utilitarian), and accident-severity framing (low vs. high) jointly shape performance trust in autonomous vehicles. In balanced samples of 300 respondents per country, participants were randomly assigned to one of eight conditions and then reported on performance trust, performance risk, hedonic well-being, and behavioral intentions. A robust three-way interaction predicted performance trust in all three contexts, but with opposite patterns: utilitarian framing enhanced the trust advantage of full autonomy under high-severity scenarios in the U.S. and Mexico, whereas in China it did so only when accidents were mild and undermined trust when accidents were severe. These results demonstrate that cultural worldviews condition how ethical programming and risk context interact to shape trust, offering actionable guidance for culturally sensitive AV design and policy.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05703156. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.