IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05703128.html

The Contextual Autonomy Principle : When and Why Social Service Robots Are Perceived as Ethical

Author

Listed:
  • Lars Meyer-Waarden

    (TSM - Toulouse School of Management Research - UT Capitole - Université Toulouse Capitole - Comue de Toulouse - Communauté d'universités et établissements de Toulouse - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - TSM - Toulouse School of Management - UT Capitole - Université Toulouse Capitole - Comue de Toulouse - Communauté d'universités et établissements de Toulouse)

  • Julien Cloarec

    (UJML - Université Jean Moulin - Lyon 3 - Université de Lyon)

Abstract

As social service robots move into both public and private settings, perceived ethicality becomes a key condition of adoption. Wepropose that the same robotic capability can acquire different ethical meanings depending on context, governance form, andsocial presence. Across three studies, we show that restaurant (vs. home) deployment increases perceived ethicality, which inturn increases intention to use. We further show that human‐in‐the‐loop oversight is evaluated as more ethical than fullautonomy in the home, whereas the reverse emerges in restaurants, primarily when social presence is high. Guided neural topicmodeling further reveals that practical utility is more salient in homes, whereas dining innovation is more salient in restau-rants. These findings advance a contextual autonomy principle, position perceived ethicality as a legitimacy judgment that linkscontext and governance to adoption, and identify social presence as the condition under which robot governance becomesmorally diagnostic.

Suggested Citation

  • Lars Meyer-Waarden & Julien Cloarec, 2026. "The Contextual Autonomy Principle : When and Why Social Service Robots Are Perceived as Ethical," Post-Print hal-05703128, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05703128
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05703128. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.