Author
Listed:
- Arnaud Estoup
(UMR CBGP - Centre de Biologie pour la Gestion des Populations - Cirad - Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement - IRD [Occitanie] - Institut de Recherche pour le Développement - délégation Occitanie - IRD - Institut de Recherche pour le Développement - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement - Institut Agro Montpellier - Institut Agro - Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement - UM - Université de Montpellier)
- Philip E. Hulme
(Lincoln University [Nouvelle-Zélande])
- Kathryn A. Hodgins
(Monash University [Caulfield] - Monash University)
- Mathieu Gautier
(UMR CBGP - Centre de Biologie pour la Gestion des Populations - Cirad - Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement - IRD [Occitanie] - Institut de Recherche pour le Développement - délégation Occitanie - IRD - Institut de Recherche pour le Développement - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement - Institut Agro Montpellier - Institut Agro - Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement - UM - Université de Montpellier)
- Eric Lombaert
(ISA - Institut Sophia Agrobiotech - UNS - Université Nice Sophia Antipolis (1965 - 2019) - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement - UniCA - Université Côte d'Azur)
- Manpreet K. Dhami
(New Zealand Institute for Bioeconomy Science)
- Angela Mc Gaughran
(University of Waikato [Hamilton])
- Ruth A. Hufbauer
(CSU - Colorado State University [Fort Collins])
Abstract
Highlights : . Invasion success is increasingly viewed as an eco-evolutionary response to anthropogenic disturbance. . The anthropogenically induced adaptation to invade hypothesis considers selection in human-modified habitats within the native range as a potential driver of invasion, shifting attention from post-introduction to pre-introduction evolution. . Human-modified habitats can now be characterised as disturbance continua using scalable predictors, enabling more robust cross-system tests. . Population genomics can identify invasion sources, reconstruct introduction pathways, detect genotype–environment associations, and test whether adaptation arose in native, human-modified habitats or after introduction. . Genomic offset analyses can link genomic variation to expected environmental mismatches, helping to forecast invasion risk. . Time-resolved genomic data and experimental validation provide powerful complements to comparative genomic analyses, strengthening causal inference beyond correlation. Abstract: The anthropogenically induced adaptation to invade (AIAI) hypothesis posits that selection in human-modified habitats within native ranges can adapt populations to invade similarly altered environments elsewhere. Although widely invoked, empirical tests of this hypothesis remain limited because disentangling native-range adaptation from post-introduction evolution is challenging. Here, we clarify how anthropogenic disturbance creates repeatable selective regimes and demonstrate how targeted sampling, population genomics, and genotype–environment associations can disentangle native-range adaptation from post-introduction evolution. Incorporating genomic offset, genetic architecture, nongenetic changes, experiments, and temporal data further strengthens inference. These insights and approaches establish the AIAI hypothesis as a mechanism that explicitly links human disturbance with the evolutionary dynamics of invasive species, providing novel insights into the prediction and management of biological invasions.
Suggested Citation
Arnaud Estoup & Philip E. Hulme & Kathryn A. Hodgins & Mathieu Gautier & Eric Lombaert & Manpreet K. Dhami & Angela Mc Gaughran & Ruth A. Hufbauer, 2026.
"Can habitat modification in the native range promote invasion?,"
Post-Print
hal-05696917, HAL.
Handle:
RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05696917
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2026.06.006
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-05696917v1
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05696917. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.