Author
Listed:
- Ali Ghods
(CERGAM - Centre d'Études et de Recherche en Gestion d'Aix-Marseille - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - UTLN - Université de Toulon)
- Antonin Ricard
(CERGAM - Centre d'Études et de Recherche en Gestion d'Aix-Marseille - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - UTLN - Université de Toulon, AMU IAE - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises (IAE) - Aix-en-Provence - AMU - Aix Marseille Université)
- Bénédicte Aldebert
(CERGAM - Centre d'Études et de Recherche en Gestion d'Aix-Marseille - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - UTLN - Université de Toulon)
- Eric Schoon
Abstract
Legitimacy is critical for the growth, survival and performance of ventures, yet efforts to measure legitimacy empirically typically focus on a single dimension of this multi‐dimensional construct. In this article, we develop a multi‐dimensional framework for measuring legitimacy using computational text analysis. We begin by elaborating the theoretical foundations of our multi‐dimensional approach, situating it in relation to influential multi‐level perspectives on legitimacy. Using dyads as our unit of analysis, we show how our approach enables simultaneous measurement of multiple dimensions of legitimacy across multiple audiences at scale. This approach provides a methodological bridge between dominant uni‐dimensional approaches to the empirical study of legitimacy, generating both a composite measure of legitimacy and indicators for each dimension individually, which can be incorporated into empirical analyses. We validate the measure using both expert evaluations and by demonstrating its predictive power for venture failure. Our study offers both a methodological advance for legitimacy research and a foundation for new theory building on how legitimacy emerges, evolves and influences outcomes not only across multiple levels but also across multiple dimensions.
Suggested Citation
Ali Ghods & Antonin Ricard & Bénédicte Aldebert & Eric Schoon, 2026.
"Measuring New Venture Legitimacy: A Multi‐dimensional Approach Using Computational Textual Analysis,"
Post-Print
hal-05668218, HAL.
Handle:
RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05668218
DOI: 10.1111/1467-8551.70089
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05668218. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.