Author
Listed:
- Renan Levaillant
(IRDL - Institut de Recherche Dupuy de Lôme - ENIB - École Nationale d'Ingénieurs de Brest - UBO EPE - Université de Brest - Bretagne INP - Institut National Polytechnique de Bretagne - UBS - Université de Bretagne Sud - UBO EPE - Université de Brest - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - ENSTA - École Nationale Supérieure de Techniques Avancées - IP Paris - Institut Polytechnique de Paris)
- Farida Saïd
(LMBA - Laboratoire de Mathématiques de Bretagne Atlantique - UBS - Université de Bretagne Sud - UBO EPE - Université de Brest - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, EXPRESSION - Expressiveness in Human Centered Data/Media - IRISA-D6 - SIGNAL, IMAGE ET LANGAGE - IRISA - Institut de Recherche en Informatique et Systèmes Aléatoires - UR - Université de Rennes - INSA Rennes - Institut National des Sciences Appliquées - Rennes - INSA - Institut National des Sciences Appliquées - UBS - Université de Bretagne Sud - ENS Rennes - École normale supérieure - Rennes - Inria - Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique - CentraleSupélec - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - IMT Atlantique - IMT Atlantique - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris])
Abstract
Project-based learning (PBL) is widely used in engineering education to develop technical, methodological, and interpersonal competencies. However, project governance—roles, responsibilities, stakeholder interactions, and decision-making structures—is rarely framed as an explicit learning object, despite its centrality in professional practice. This paper examines a multi-year PBL program in Mechatronics at a French engineering school that integrates a formal governance framework built on four pillars: the reference framework, the project team, supervisors, and external clients. Rather than assessing the program's causal effectiveness, the study explores students' perceived appropriation of these pillars and their perceptions of the roles played by supervisors and external clients. A 20-item mixed-format questionnaire was completed by 60 students: 34 of 38 enrolled fourth-year students and 26 of 42 enrolled fifth-year students. Additional responses from six alumni are used for qualitative illustration. Results reveal a selective and pillar-dependent pattern of perceived appropriation. Concrete, recurrent tools are perceived as more useful than normative charters; the project team appears as the main site of perceived interpersonal transformation; external clients provide exposure to professional realism; and the supervisory pillar is the most critically evaluated. The comparison between cohorts suggests a differentiation of judgment rather than a uniform increase in satisfaction. The study contributes to understanding PBL not only as a setting for task management, but as a collaborative learning environment in which students learn to appropriate, negotiate, and evaluate a shared organizational framework. These findings point to the importance of making governance visible in action, ensuring coherence among supervisors, and deliberately leveraging external clients as drivers of professionalization.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05661114. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.