Author
Listed:
- Meryem Hanini
(Université Hassan 1er [Settat], CREGO - Centre de Recherche en Gestion des Organisations - Université de Haute-Alsace (UHA) - Université de Haute-Alsace (UHA) Mulhouse - Colmar - UMLP - Université Marie et Louis Pasteur - UBFC - Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté [COMUE] - UBE - Université Bourgogne Europe)
- Said El Ganich
(Université Hassan 1er [Settat])
- Grégory Wegmann
(CREGO - Centre de Recherche en Gestion des Organisations - Université de Haute-Alsace (UHA) - Université de Haute-Alsace (UHA) Mulhouse - Colmar - UMLP - Université Marie et Louis Pasteur - UBFC - Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté [COMUE] - UBE - Université Bourgogne Europe)
Abstract
This paper presents a comparative content analysis of the views of the scholars and the professionals regarding Artificial Intelligence (AI) in management accounting. The analysis investigates how each perspective constructs the purpose and implications of AI, through a review of ten peer-reviewed articles and ten institutional or consulting reports. It reveals a persistent gap since academic researchers frame AI as a crucial driver of the epistemological and ethical transformation, while practitioners use AI as an emerging technology to improve efficiency, competency and governance. Despite the differences, the two perspectives share a common standpoint concerning the pivotal role of hybrid competencies changing the management accountant's role. The paper serves a threefold purpose; theoretically, the goal is to situate AI within distinct epistemological traditions while methodologically, the article demonstrates the importance of content analysis in bridging theory and practice. Practically, the paper identifies the enrichment of "hybrid competencies" concept through the reciprocal learning between scholars and professional experts.
Suggested Citation
Meryem Hanini & Said El Ganich & Grégory Wegmann, 2025.
"The Academic view and the Professional Practice of Artificial Intelligence in Management Accounting: A Comparative Analysis,"
Post-Print
hal-05654157, HAL.
Handle:
RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05654157
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05654157v1
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05654157. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.