Author
Listed:
- Corentin Biteau
(The Insect Institut, Unit 204, Philadelphia)
- Tom Bry-Chevalier
(BETA - Bureau d'Économie Théorique et Appliquée - AgroParisTech - UNISTRA - Université de Strasbourg - Université de Haute-Alsace (UHA) - Université de Haute-Alsace (UHA) Mulhouse - Colmar - UL - Université de Lorraine - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement, Chaire économie du climat - CEC - Chaire économie du climat)
- Dustin Crummett
(The Insect Institut, Unit 204, Philadelphia)
- Katrina Loewy
(The Insect Institut, Unit 204, Philadelphia)
- Ren Ryba
(Anim Ask, Unit 10,Linen House,London)
- Michael St. Jules
(The Insect Institut, Unit 204, Philadelphia)
Abstract
Insect farming is frequently promoted as a sustainable food solution, yet current evidence challenges many environmental benefits claimed by industry proponents. This review critically examines the scientific foundation for assessing the environmental impacts of insect farming in both human food and animal feed applications. Our analysis reveals substantial limitations in existing research. Most studies have been conducted in small‐scale settings, which may not accurately reflect real‐world, industrial conditions. There are significant uncertainties, with many authors highlighting the fact that the future environmental impact of large‐scale insect production is unknown. This is especially true given claims that insects can be fed on food waste and that insect frass can be used as fertiliser, both of which have considerable challenges to overcome at scale. Furthermore, insect‐based foods predominantly substitute for plant products with limited environmental impact rather than meat, while evidence indicates that insect feed and pet food applications, when not utilising genuine food waste, generate greater environmental impacts than conventional alternatives. By providing a comprehensive overview, this review highlights key areas for further research and ensures policymakers have a clearer picture of the remaining uncertainties surrounding this emerging industry.
Suggested Citation
Corentin Biteau & Tom Bry-Chevalier & Dustin Crummett & Katrina Loewy & Ren Ryba & Michael St. Jules, 2025.
"Have the environmental benefits of insect farming been overstated? A critical review,"
Post-Print
hal-05650831, HAL.
Handle:
RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05650831
DOI: 10.1111/brv.70076
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05650831. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.