IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05650672.html

Comparing meat alternatives for a sustainable food system

Author

Listed:
  • Tom Bry-Chevalier

    (BETA - Bureau d'Économie Théorique et Appliquée - AgroParisTech - UNISTRA - Université de Strasbourg - Université de Haute-Alsace (UHA) - Université de Haute-Alsace (UHA) Mulhouse - Colmar - UL - Université de Lorraine - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement, CEC - Chaire Economie du Climat - Université Paris Dauphine-PSL - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres)

Abstract

This scoping review evaluates the potential of four alternative protein sources (plant-based meats, cultivated meat, insects, and single-cell proteins) to contribute to a sustainable food system. Using a holistic framework, each option is assessed across four dimensions: environmental impact, production scalability, consumer acceptability, and animal welfare. Plant-based meats rank highest, with established infrastructure, growing consumer acceptance, and substantial environmental benefits. Single-cell proteins show promise despite scalability uncertainties, while cultivated meat faces significant technical and economic challenges. Insect-based proteins encounter barriers across all dimensions, including limited environmental advantages and widespread consumer rejection. This multidimensional comparative analysis supports prioritizing plant-based meats in policy and investment strategies while highlighting critical research needs for emerging alternatives, demonstrating the value of systematic head-to-head comparisons in guiding resource allocation for sustainable food system transitions.

Suggested Citation

  • Tom Bry-Chevalier, 2026. "Comparing meat alternatives for a sustainable food system," Post-Print hal-05650672, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05650672
    DOI: 10.1038/s41538-025-00694-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05650672. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.