Author
Listed:
- Fayrouz Akrim
(UBO EPE - Université de Brest, LEGO - Laboratoire d'Economie et de Gestion de l'Ouest - UBS - Université de Bretagne Sud - UBO EPE - Université de Brest - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris] - IBSHS - Institut Brestois des Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société - UBO EPE - Université de Brest - UBL - Université Bretagne Loire - IMT Atlantique - IMT Atlantique - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris])
- Camille Chédotal
(LEGO - Laboratoire d'Economie et de Gestion de l'Ouest - UBS - Université de Bretagne Sud - UBO EPE - Université de Brest - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris] - IBSHS - Institut Brestois des Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société - UBO EPE - Université de Brest - UBL - Université Bretagne Loire - IMT Atlantique - IMT Atlantique - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris])
- Elina Chiesa
(ADRIA Développement)
- Camille Renaud
(ADRIA Développement)
Abstract
Perceived naturalness is not limited to the composition of food products but encompasses multiple dimensions, as consumers seek consistency across the entire production chain. In this context, agri-food actors aiming to improve their offerings in terms of naturalness are faced with trade-offs. This raises the following question: which attributes are the most determinant of perceived naturalness? The literature identifies a wide range of attributes influencing this perception, yet does not provide a clear prioritization. This research combines a qualitative study to identify the most frequently cited attributes by consumers, and a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to estimate their relative importance. The results show that the perceived naturalness of a madeleine primarily relies on three attributes: Nutri-Score, the presence of raw ingredients, and the origin of ingredients. More specifically, a madeleine is perceived as more natural when it has a Nutri-Score C, is locally produced, and contains simple ingredients. These findings provide insights for decision-making in product formulation and communication strategies in the agri-food sector.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05634839. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.